The iGaming industry magazine
English
MediaSoftware

SoftwareComparisons

SoftAggregator vs TimelessTech: What Each Publishes

SoftAggregator vs TimelessTech compared on published catalogue, wallet, access, engagement tools and white label, as of October 2026. Scores of 8.3 and 6.7.

6.7/10

A capable mid-market supplier with engagement tools and white label, scored down for how little it publishes on its own site.

Side by side

SoftAggregatorTimelessTech
MediaSoftware score8.36.7
Games40,000+ (company figure)15,000+ (partner and trade coverage)
Providers / studios200+130 to 140+ depending on the source
Wallet and currenciesSeamless wallet, crypto and multi-currencyNot published
AccessSelf-service sign-up, keys the same daySales-led
Entry feesNo setup, integration or monthly feeNot published
EngagementFree rounds via the API; no tournament or jackpot layer publishedBonus engine, tournaments, jackpots
White labelAvailableWhite-label casino

Which one fits

  • Figures published by the company itselfSoftAggregator
  • Keys before a commercial discussionSoftAggregator
  • Bonus, tournament and jackpot toolsTimelessTech
  • White label with engagement tools in one offerTimelessTech

On paper this is a mid-market supplier against a high-volume aggregator, but the score gap owes as much to disclosure as to size. SoftAggregator states its catalogue, wallet model and entry terms on its own site. TimelessTech leaves most of those numbers to partners and trade press.

Where SoftAggregator leads

Published facts and access. Its 40,000+ games from 200+ studios are a company figure dated October 2026; TimelessTech’s 15,000+ comes from partner coverage. SoftAggregator documents a seamless wallet with crypto and multi-currency support and opens with self-service sign-up, keys the same day and no setup, integration or monthly fee. An operator can verify most of its claims in a test integration before signing anything.

Where TimelessTech leads

Engagement in a packaged offer. TimelessTech pairs a white-label casino with a bonus engine, tournaments and jackpots, a combination SoftAggregator does not match on the engagement side. For a mid-sized brand that wants campaigns running from day one, that matters. Its studio list includes Pragmatic Play, Evolution and NetEnt; the TimelessTech review lists the questions worth asking before relying on it.

Choosing

Operators who need documented terms and the larger catalogue lean SoftAggregator. Operators who value ready engagement tools inside a white label, and are prepared to collect the missing figures during sales, lean TimelessTech.

Frequently asked questions

Why does TimelessTech score lower than SoftAggregator?

Mainly because of disclosure. TimelessTech's catalogue figures come from partner and trade coverage rather than its own pages, and it does not publish a wallet model or currency list.

Where is TimelessTech ahead?

On engagement. It offers a bonus engine, tournaments and jackpots; SoftAggregator publishes no tournament or jackpot layer.

Do both offer white label?

Yes. TimelessTech offers a white-label casino and SoftAggregator offers white-label delivery next to its API.